| You are viewing the html version of Simple Nature, by Benjamin Crowell. This version is only designed for casual browsing, and may have some formatting problems. For serious reading, you want the printer-friendly Adobe Acrobat version. (c) 1998-2009 Benjamin Crowell, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license. Photo credits are given at the end of the Adobe Acrobat version. |
Madam, what good is a baby? -- Michael Faraday, when asked by Queen Victoria what the electrical devices in his lab were good for
A few years ago, my wife and I bought a house with Character, Character being a survival mechanism that houses have evolved in order to convince humans to agree to much larger mortgage payments than they'd originally envisioned. Anyway, one of the features that gives our house Character is that it possesses, built into the wall of the family room, a set of three pachinko machines. These are Japanese gambling devices sort of like vertical pinball machines. (The legal papers we got from the sellers hastened to tell us that they were “for amusement purposes only.”) Unfortunately, only one of the three machines was working when we moved in, and it soon died on us. Having become a pachinko addict, I decided to fix it, but that was easier said than done. The inside is a veritable Rube Goldberg mechanism of levers, hooks, springs, and chutes. My hormonal pride, combined with my Ph.D. in physics, made me certain of success, and rendered my eventual utter failure all the more demoralizing.
Contemplating my defeat, I realized how few complex mechanical devices I used from day to day. Apart from our cars and my saxophone, every technological tool in our modern life-support system was electronic rather than mechanical.
a / Gymnotus carapo, a knifefish, uses electrical signals to sense its environment and to communicate with others of its species. (Greg DeGreef)
We are surrounded by things we have been told are “electrical,” but it's far from obvious what they have in common to justify being grouped together. What relationship is there between the way socks cling together and the way a battery lights a lightbulb? We have been told that both an electric eel and our own brains are somehow electrical in nature, but what do they have in common?
British physicist Michael Faraday (1791-1867) set out to address this problem. He investigated electricity from a variety of sources --- including electric eels! --- to see whether they could all produce the same effects, such as shocks and sparks, attraction and repulsion. “Heating” refers, for example, to the way a lightbulb filament gets hot enough to glow and emit light. Magnetic induction is an effect discovered by Faraday himself that connects electricity and magnetism. We will not study this effect, which is the basis for the electric generator, in detail until later in the book.
| attraction and | ||||
| shocks | sparks | repulsion | heating | |
| rubbing | surd | surd | surd | surd |
| battery | surd | surd | surd | surd |
| animal | surd | surd | surd) | surd |
| magnetically induced | surd | surd | surd | surd |
The table shows a summary of some of Faraday's results. Check marks indicate that Faraday or his close contemporaries were able to verify that a particular source of electricity was capable of producing a certain effect. (They evidently failed to demonstrate attraction and repulsion between objects charged by electric eels, although modern workers have studied these species in detail and been able to understand all their electrical characteristics on the same footing as other forms of electricity.)
Faraday's results indicate that there is nothing fundamentally different about the types of electricity supplied by the various sources. They are all able to produce a wide variety of identical effects. Wrote Faraday, “The general conclusion which must be drawn from this collection of facts is that electricity, whatever may be its source, is identical in its nature.”
If the types of electricity are the same thing, what thing is that? The answer is provided by the fact that all the sources of electricity can cause objects to repel or attract each other. We use the word “charge” to describe the property of an object that allows it to participate in such electrical forces, and we have learned that charge is present in matter in the form of nuclei and electrons. Evidently all these electrical phenomena boil down to the motion of charged particles in matter.
If the fundamental phenomenon is the motion of charged particles, then how can we define a useful numerical measurement of it? We might describe the flow of a river simply by the velocity of the water, but velocity will not be appropriate for electrical purposes because we need to take into account how much charge the moving particles have, and in any case there are no practical devices sold at Radio Shack that can tell us the velocity of charged particles. Experiments show that the intensity of various electrical effects is related to a different quantity: the number of coulombs of charge that pass by a certain point per second. By analogy with the flow of water, this quantity is called the electric current , I. Its units of coulombs/second are more conveniently abbreviated as amperes, 1 A=1 C/s. (In informal speech, one usually says “amps.”)
The main subtlety involved in this definition is how to account for the two types of charge. The stream of water coming from a hose is made of atoms containing charged particles, but it produces none of the effects we associate with electric currents. For example, you do not get an electrical shock when you are sprayed by a hose. This type of experiment shows that the effect created by the motion of one type of charged particle can be canceled out by the motion of the opposite type of charge in the same direction. In water, every oxygen atom with a charge of +8e is surrounded by eight electrons with charges of -e, and likewise for the hydrogen atoms.
We therefore refine our definition of current as follows:
When charged particles are exchanged between regions of space A and B, the electric current flowing from A to B is defined as
where d q is the change in region B's total charge occurring over a period of time d t.
In the garden hose example, your body picks up equal amounts of positive and negative charge, resulting in no change in your total charge, so the electrical current flowing into you is zero.
b / Example 1
◊ We're just assuming the rate of flow is constant, so we can talk about Δ q instead of d q.
Cell A has positive current going into it because its charge is increased, i.e., has a positive value of Δ q.
Cell B has the same current as cell A, because by losing one unit of negative charge it also ends up increasing its own total charge by one unit.
Cell C's total charge is reduced by three units, so it has a large negative current going into it.
Cell D loses one unit of charge, so it has a small negative current into it.
◊ A charged balloon falls to the ground, and its charge begins leaking off to the Earth. Suppose that the charge on the balloon is given by q=ae-bt. Find the current as a function of time, and interpret the answer.
◊ Taking the derivative, we have
An exponential function approaches zero as the exponent gets more and more negative. This means that both the charge and the current are decreasing in magnitude with time. It makes sense that the charge approaches zero, since the balloon is losing its charge. It also makes sense that the current is decreasing in magnitude, since charge cannot flow at the same rate forever without overshooting zero.
The reverse of differentiation is integration, so if we know the current as a function of time, we can find the charge by integrating. Example 8 on page 484 shows such a calculation.
It may seem strange to say that a negatively charged particle going one way creates a current going the other way, but this is quite ordinary. As we will see, currents flow through metal wires via the motion of electrons, which are negatively charged, so the direction of motion of the electrons in a circuit is always opposite to the direction of the current. Of course it would have been convenient of Benjamin Franklin had defined the positive and negative signs of charge the opposite way, since so many electrical devices are based on metal wires.
◊ If a lightbulb has 1.0 A flowing through it, how many electrons will pass through the filament in 1.0 s?
◊ We are only calculating the number of electrons that flow, so we can ignore the positive and negative signs. Also, since the rate of flow is constant, we don't really need to think in terms of calculus; the derivative d q/d t that defines current is the same as Δ q/Δ t in this situation. Solving for Δ q= I Δ t gives a charge of 1.0 C flowing in this time interval. The number of electrons is
c / 1. Static electricity runs out quickly. 2. A practical circuit. 3. An open circuit. 4. How an ammeter works. 5. Measuring the current with an ammeter.
How can we put electric currents to work? The only method of controlling electric charge we have studied so far is to charge different substances, e.g., rubber and fur, by rubbing them against each other. Figure c/1 shows an attempt to use this technique to light a lightbulb. This method is unsatisfactory. True, current will flow through the bulb, since electrons can move through metal wires, and the excess electrons on the rubber rod will therefore come through the wires and bulb due to the attraction of the positively charged fur and the repulsion of the other electrons. The problem is that after a zillionth of a second of current, the rod and fur will both have run out of charge. No more current will flow, and the lightbulb will go out.
Figure c/2 shows a setup that works. The battery pushes charge through the circuit, and recycles it over and over again. (We will have more to say later in this chapter about how batteries work.) This is called a complete circuit. Today, the electrical use of the word “circuit” is the only one that springs to mind for most people, but the original meaning was to travel around and make a round trip, as when a circuit court judge would ride around the boondocks, dispensing justice in each town on a certain date.
Note that an example like c/3 does not work. The wire will quickly begin acquiring a net charge, because it has no way to get rid of the charge flowing into it. The repulsion of this charge will make it more and more difficult to send any more charge in, and soon the electrical forces exerted by the battery will be canceled out completely. The whole process would be over so quickly that the filament would not even have enough time to get hot and glow. This is known as an open circuit. Exactly the same thing would happen if the complete circuit of figure c/2 was cut somewhere with a pair of scissors, and in fact that is essentially how an ordinary light switch works: by opening up a gap in the circuit.
The definition of electric current we have developed has the great virtue that it is easy to measure. In practical electrical work, one almost always measures current, not charge. The instrument used to measure current is called an ammeter. A simplified ammeter, c/4, simply consists of a coiled-wire magnet whose force twists an iron needle against the resistance of a spring. The greater the current, the greater the force. Although the construction of ammeters may differ, their use is always the same. We break into the path of the electric current and interpose the meter like a tollbooth on a road, c/5. There is still a complete circuit, and as far as the battery and bulb are concerned, the ammeter is just another segment of wire.
Does it matter where in the circuit we place the ammeter? Could we, for instance, have put it in the left side of the circuit instead of the right? Conservation of charge tells us that this can make no difference. Charge is not destroyed or “used up” by the lightbulb, so we will get the same current reading on either side of it. What is “used up” is energy stored in the battery, which is being converted into heat and light energy.
Electrical circuits can be used for sending signals, storing information, or doing calculations, but their most common purpose by far is to manipulate energy, as in the battery-and-bulb example of the previous section. We know that lightbulbs are rated in units of watts, i.e., how many joules per second of energy they can convert into heat and light, but how would this relate to the flow of charge as measured in amperes? By way of analogy, suppose your friend, who didn't take physics, can't find any job better than pitching bales of hay. The number of calories he burns per hour will certainly depend on how many bales he pitches per minute, but it will also be proportional to how much mechanical work he has to do on each bale. If his job is to toss them up into a hayloft, he will got tired a lot more quickly than someone who merely tips bales off a loading dock into trucks. In metric units,
Similarly, the rate of energy transformation by a battery will not just depend on how many coulombs per second it pushes through a circuit but also on how much mechanical work it has to do on each coulomb of charge:
or
Units of joules per coulomb are abbreviated as volts, 1 V=1 J/C, named after the Italian physicist Alessandro Volta. Everyone knows that batteries are rated in units of volts, but the voltage concept is more general than that; it turns out that voltage is a property of every point in space. To gain more insight, let's think more carefully about what goes on in the battery and bulb circuit.
To do work on a charged particle, the battery apparently must be exerting forces on it. How does it do this? Well, the only thing that can exert an electrical force on a charged particle is another charged particle. It's as though the haybales were pushing and pulling each other into the hayloft! This is potentially a horribly complicated situation. Even if we knew how much excess positive or negative charge there was at every point in the circuit (which realistically we don't) we would have to calculate zillions of forces using Coulomb's law, perform all the vector additions, and finally calculate how much work was being done on the charges as they moved along. To make things even more scary, there is more than one type of charged particle that moves: electrons are what move in the wires and the bulb's filament, but ions are the moving charge carriers inside the battery. Luckily, there are two ways in which we can simplify things:
The situation is unchanging. Unlike the imaginary setup in which we attempted to light a bulb using a rubber rod and a piece of fur, this circuit maintains itself in a steady state (after perhaps a microsecond-long period of settling down after the circuit is first assembled). The current is steady, and as charge flows out of any area of the circuit it is replaced by the same amount of charge flowing in. The amount of excess positive or negative charge in any part of the circuit therefore stays constant. Similarly, when we watch a river flowing, the water goes by but the river doesn't disappear.
Force depends only on position. Since the charge distribution is not changing, the total electrical force on a charged particle depends only on its own charge and on its location. If another charged particle of the same type visits the same location later on, it will feel exactly the same force.
The second observation tells us that there is nothing all that different about the experience of one charged particle as compared to another's. If we single out one particle to pay attention to, and figure out the amount of work done on it by electrical forces as it goes from point A to point B along a certain path, then this is the same amount of work that will be done on any other charged particles of the same type as it follows the same path. For the sake of visualization, let's think about the path that starts at one terminal of the battery, goes through the light bulb's filament, and ends at the other terminal. When an object experiences a force that depends only on its position (and when certain other, technical conditions are satisfied), we can define an electrical energy associated with the position of that object. The amount of work done on the particle by electrical forces as it moves from A to B equals the drop in electrical energy between A and B. This electrical energy is what is being converted into other forms of energy such as heat and light. We therefore define voltage in general as electrical energy per unit charge:
The difference in voltage between two points in space is defined as
where Δ Uelec is the change in the electrical energy of a particle with charge q as it moves from the initial point to the final point.
The amount of power dissipated (i.e., rate at which energy is transformed by the flow of electricity) is then given by the equation
◊ An ampere-hour is a unit of current multiplied by a unit of time. Current is charge per unit time, so an ampere-hour is in fact a funny unit of charge:
1800 milliamp-hours is therefore 1800×10-3× 3600 C=6.5×103 C. That's a huge number of charged particles, but the total loss of electrical energy will just be their total charge multiplied by the voltage difference across which they move:
◊ Doorbells are often rated in volt-amps. What does this combination of units mean?
◊ Current times voltage gives units of power, P= IΔ V, so volt-amps are really just a nonstandard way of writing watts. They are telling you how much power the doorbell requires.
◊ If a 9.0-volt battery causes 1.0 A to flow through a lightbulb, how much power is dissipated?
◊ The voltage rating of a battery tells us what voltage difference Δ V it is designed to maintain between its terminals.
The only nontrivial thing in this problem was dealing with the units. One quickly gets used to translating common combinations like A⋅V into simpler terms.
Here are a few questions and answers about the voltage concept.
{}Question:
OK, so what is voltage, really?
{}Answer: A device like a battery has positive and negative
charges inside it that push other charges around the outside
circuit. A higher-voltage battery has denser charges in it,
which will do more work on each charged particle that moves
through the outside circuit.
To use a gravitational analogy, we can put a paddlewheel at the bottom of either a tall waterfall or a short one, but a kg of water that falls through the greater gravitational energy difference will have more energy to give up to the paddlewheel at the bottom.
{}Question: Why do we define voltage as electrical
energy divided by charge, instead of just defining it as
electrical energy?
{}Answer: One answer is that it's the only definition that
makes the equation P=I Δ V work. A more general
answer is that we want to be able to define a voltage
difference between any two points in space without having to
know in advance how much charge the particles moving between
them will have. If you put a nine-volt battery on your
tongue, then the charged particles that move across your
tongue and give you that tingly sensation are not electrons
but ions, which may have charges of +e, -2e, or
practically anything. The manufacturer probably expected the
battery to be used mostly in circuits with metal wires,
where the charged particles that flowed would be electrons
with charges of -e. If the ones flowing across your tongue
happen to have charges of -2e, the electrical energy
difference for them will be twice as much, but dividing by
their charge of -2e in the definition of voltage will
still give a result of 9 V.
{}Question: Are there two separate roles for the charged
particles in the circuit, a type that sits still and exerts
the forces, and another that moves under the influence of those forces?
{}Answer: No. Every charged particle simultaneously plays both
roles. Newton's third law says that any particle that has an
electrical forces acting on it must also be exerting an
electrical force back on the other particle. There are no
“designated movers” or “designated force-makers.”
{}Question: Why does the definition of voltage only refer to
voltage differences?
{}Answer: It's perfectly OK to define voltage as V=Uelec/q.
But recall that it is only differences in interaction
energy, U, that have direct physical meaning in physics.
Similarly, voltage differences are really more useful than
absolute voltages. A voltmeter measures voltage differences,
not absolute voltages.
◊ A roller coaster is sort of like an electric circuit, but it uses gravitational forces on the cars instead of electric ones. What would a high-voltage roller coaster be like? What would a high-current roller coaster be like?
◊ Criticize the following statements:
◊ When you touch a 9-volt battery to your tongue, both positive and negative ions move through your saliva. Which ions go which way?
◊ I once touched a piece of physics apparatus that had been wired incorrectly, and got a several-thousand-volt voltage difference across my hand. I was not injured. For what possible reason would the shock have had insufficient power to hurt me?
e / Georg Simon Ohm (1787-1854).
f / Four objects made of the same substance have different resistances.
g / A superconducting segment of the ATLAS accelerator at Argonne National Laboratory near Chicago. It is used to accelerate beams of ions to a few percent of the speed of light for nuclear physics research. The shiny silver-colored surfaces are made of the element niobium, which is a superconductor at relatively high temperatures compared to other metals --- relatively high meaning the temperature of liquid helium! The beam of ions passes through the holes in the two small cylinders on the ends of the curved rods. Charge is shuffled back and forth between them at a frequency of 12 million cycles per second, so that they take turns being positive and negative. The positively charged beam consists of short spurts, each timed so that when it is in one of the segments it will be pulled forward by negative charge on the cylinder in front of it and pushed forward by the positively charged one behind. The huge currents involved would quickly melt any metal that was not superconducting, but in a superconductor they produce no heat at all.
h / Short-circuiting a battery. Warning: you can burn yourself this way or start a fire! If you want to try this, try making the connection only very briefly, use a low-voltage battery, and avoid touching the battery or the wire, both of which will get hot.
| color | meaning |
| black | 0 |
| brown | 1 |
| red | 2 |
| orange | 3 |
| yellow | 4 |
| green | 5 |
| blue | 6 |
| violet | 7 |
| gray | 8 |
| white | 9 |
| silver | pm 10 |
| gold | pm 5 |
Color codes used on resistors.
j / An example of a resistor with a color code.
k / The symbol used in schematics to represent a resistor.
l / 1. A simplified diagram of how a voltmeter works. 2. Measuring the voltage difference across a lightbulb. 3. The same setup drawn in schematic form. 4. The setup for measuring current is different.
So far we have simply presented it as an observed fact that a battery-and-bulb circuit quickly settles down to a steady flow, but why should it? Newton's second law, a=F/m, would seem to predict that the steady forces on the charged particles should make them whip around the circuit faster and faster. The answer is that as charged particles move through matter, there are always forces, analogous to frictional forces, that resist the motion. These forces need to be included in Newton's second law, which is really a=Ftotal/m, not a=F/m. If, by analogy, you push a crate across the floor at constant speed, i.e., with zero acceleration, the total force on it must be zero. After you get the crate going, the floor's frictional force is exactly canceling out your force. The chemical energy stored in your body is being transformed into heat in the crate and the floor, and no longer into an increase in the crate's kinetic energy. Similarly, the battery's internal chemical energy is converted into heat, not into perpetually increasing the charged particles' kinetic energy. Changing energy into heat may be a nuisance in some circuits, such as a computer chip, but it is vital in a lightbulb, which must get hot enough to glow. Whether we like it or not, this kind of heating effect is going to occur any time charged particles move through matter.
What determines the amount of heating? One flashlight bulb designed to work with a 9-volt battery might be labeled 1.0 watts, another 5.0. How does this work? Even without knowing the details of this type of friction at the atomic level, we can relate the heat dissipation to the amount of current that flows via the equation P=IΔV. If the two flashlight bulbs can have two different values of P when used with a battery that maintains the same Δ V, it must be that the 5.0-watt bulb allows five times more current to flow through it.
For many substances, including the tungsten from which lightbulb filaments are made, experiments show that the amount of current that will flow through it is directly proportional to the voltage difference placed across it. For an object made of such a substance, we define its electrical resistance as follows:
If an object inserted in a circuit displays a current flow which is proportional to the voltage difference across it, then we define its resistance as the constant ratio
The units of resistance are volts/ampere, usually abbreviated as ohms, symbolized with the capital Greek letter omega, Ω.
◊ A flashlight bulb powered by a 9-volt battery has a resistance of 10 Ω. How much current will it draw?
◊ Solving the definition of resistance for I, we find
Ohm's law states that many substances, including many solids and some liquids, display this kind of behavior, at least for voltages that are not too large. The fact that Ohm's law is called a “law” should not be taken to mean that all materials obey it, or that it has the same fundamental importance as Newton's laws, for example. Materials are called ohmic or nonohmic, depending on whether they obey Ohm's law.
If objects of the same size and shape made from two different ohmic materials have different resistances, we can say that one material is more resistive than the other, or equivalently that it is less conductive. Materials, such as metals, that are very conductive are said to be good conductors. Those that are extremely poor conductors, for example wood or rubber, are classified as insulators. There is no sharp distinction between the two classes of materials. Some, such as silicon, lie midway between the two extremes, and are called semiconductors.
On an intuitive level, we can understand the idea of resistance by making the sounds “hhhhhh” and “ffffff.” To make air flow out of your mouth, you use your diaphragm to compress the air in your chest. The pressure difference between your chest and the air outside your mouth is analogous to a voltage difference. When you make the “h” sound, you form your mouth and throat in a way that allows air to flow easily. The large flow of air is like a large current. Dividing by a large current in the definition of resistance means that we get a small resistance. We say that the small resistance of your mouth and throat allows a large current to flow. When you make the “f” sound, you increase the resistance and cause a smaller current to flow.
Note that although the resistance of an object depends on the substance it is made of, we cannot speak simply of the “resistance of gold” or the “resistance of wood.” Figure f shows four examples of objects that have had wires attached at the ends as electrical connections. If they were made of the same substance, they would all nevertheless have different resistances because of their different sizes and shapes. A more detailed discussion will be more natural in the context of the following chapter, but it should not be too surprising that the resistance of f/2 will be greater than that of f/1 --- the image of water flowing through a pipe, however incorrect, gives us the right intuition. Object f/3 will have a smaller resistance than f/1 because the charged particles have less of it to get through.
All materials display some variation in resistance according to temperature (a fact that is used in thermostats to make a thermometer that can be easily interfaced to an electric circuit). More spectacularly, most metals have been found to exhibit a sudden change to zero resistance when cooled to a certain critical temperature. They are then said to be superconductors. Theoretically, superconductors should make a great many exciting devices possible, for example coiled-wire magnets that could be used to levitate trains. In practice, the critical temperatures of all metals are very low, and the resulting need for extreme refrigeration has made their use uneconomical except for such specialized applications as particle accelerators for physics research.
But scientists have recently made the surprising discovery that certain ceramics are superconductors at less extreme temperatures. The technological barrier is now in finding practical methods for making wire out of these brittle materials. Wall Street is currently investing billions of dollars in developing superconducting devices for cellular phone relay stations based on these materials. In 2001, the city of Copenhagen replaced a short section of its electrical power trunks with superconducing cables, and they are now in operation and supplying power to customers.
There is currently no satisfactory theory of superconductivity in general, although superconductivity in metals is understood fairly well. Unfortunately I have yet to find a fundamental explanation of superconductivity in metals that works at the introductory level.
We can interpret this in order to explain why a superconductor needs to be used. The constant b must be very large, since the current is supposed to oscillate back and forth millions of times a second. Looking at the final result, we see that if b is a very large number, and q is to be a significant amount of charge, then a must be a very large number as well. If a is numerically large, then the current must be very large, so it would heat the accelerator too much if it was flowing through an ordinary conductor.
The idea of a superconductor leads us to the question of how we should expect an object to behave if it is made of a very good conductor. Superconductors are an extreme case, but often a metal wire can be thought of as a perfect conductor, for example if the parts of the circuit other than the wire are made of much less conductive materials. What happens if R equals zero in the equation R=Δ V/I? The result of dividing two numbers can only be zero if the number on top equals zero. This tells us that if we pick any two points in a perfect conductor, the voltage difference between them must be zero. In other words, the entire conductor must be at the same voltage.
Constant voltage means that no work would be done on a charge as it moved from one point in the conductor to another. If zero work was done only along a certain path between two specific points, it might mean that positive work was done along part of the path and negative work along the rest, resulting in a cancellation. But there is no way that the work could come out to be zero for all possible paths unless the electrical force on a charge was in fact zero at every point. Suppose, for example, that you build up a static charge by scuffing your feet on a carpet, and then you deposit some of that charge onto a doorknob, which is a good conductor. How can all that charge be in the doorknob without creating any electrical force at any point inside it? The only possible answer is that the charge moves around until it has spread itself into just the right configuration so that the forces exerted by all the little bits of excess surface charge on any charged particle within the doorknob exactly canceled out.
We can explain this behavior if we assume that the charge placed on the doorknob eventually settles down into a stable equilibrium. Since the doorknob is a conductor, the charge is free to move through it. If it was free to move and any part of it did experience a nonzero total force from the rest of the charge, then it would move, and we would not have an equilibrium.
It also turns out that charge placed on a conductor, once it reaches its equilibrium configuration, is entirely on the surface, not on the interior. We will not prove this fact formally, but it is intuitively reasonable. Suppose, for instance, that the net charge on the conductor is negative, i.e., it has an excess of electrons. These electrons all repel each other, and this repulsion will tend to push them onto the surface, since being on the surface allows them to be as far apart as possible.
So far we have been assuming a perfect conductor. What if it is a good conductor, but not a perfect one? Then we can solve for Δ V=IR. An ordinary-sized current will make a very small result when we multiply it by the resistance of a good conductor such as a metal wire. The voltage throughout the wire will then be nearly constant. If, on the other hand, the current is extremely large, we can have a significant voltage difference. This is what happens in a short-circuit: a circuit in which a low-resistance pathway connects the two sides of a voltage source. Note that this is much more specific than the popular use of the term to indicate any electrical malfunction at all. If, for example, you short-circuit a 9-volt battery as shown in figure h, you will produce perhaps a thousand amperes of current, leading to a very large value of P=IΔ V. The wire gets hot!
self-check: What would happen to the battery in this kind of short circuit? (answer in the back of the PDF version of the book)
At this stage, most students have a hard time understanding why resistors would be used inside a radio or a computer. We obviously want a lightbulb or an electric stove to have a circuit element that resists the flow of electricity and heats up, but heating is undesirable in radios and computers. Without going too far afield, let's use a mechanical analogy to get a general idea of why a resistor would be used in a radio.
The main parts of a radio receiver are an antenna, a tuner for selecting the frequency, and an amplifier to strengthen the signal sufficiently to drive a speaker. The tuner resonates at the selected frequency, just as in the examples of mechanical resonance discussed in 3. The behavior of a mechanical resonator depends on three things: its inertia, its stiffness, and the amount of friction or damping. The first two parameters locate the peak of the resonance curve, while the damping determines the width of the resonance. In the radio tuner we have an electrically vibrating system that resonates at a particular frequency. Instead of a physical object moving back and forth, these vibrations consist of electrical currents that flow first in one direction and then in the other. In a mechanical system, damping means taking energy out of the vibration in the form of heat, and exactly the same idea applies to an electrical system: the resistor supplies the damping, and therefore controls the width of the resonance. If we set out to eliminate all resistance in the tuner circuit, by not building in a resistor and by somehow getting rid of all the inherent electrical resistance of the wires, we would have a useless radio. The tuner's resonance would be so narrow that we could never get close enough to the right frequency to bring in the station. The roles of inertia and stiffness are played by other circuit elements we have not discusses (a capacitor and a coil).
Inside any electronic gadget you will see quite a few little circuit elements like the one shown below. These resistors are simply a cylinder of ohmic material with wires attached to the end.
Many electrical devices are based on electrical resistance and Ohm's law, even if they do not have little components in them that look like the usual resistor. The following are some examples.
There is nothing special about a lightbulb filament --- you can easily make a lightbulb by cutting a narrow waist into a metallic gum wrapper and connecting the wrapper across the terminals of a 9-volt battery. The trouble is that it will instantly burn out. Edison solved this technical challenge by encasing the filament in an evacuated bulb, which prevented burning, since burning requires oxygen.
The polygraph, or “lie detector,” is really just a set of meters for recording physical measures of the subject's psychological stress, such as sweating and quickened heartbeat. The real-time sweat measurement works on the principle that dry skin is a good insulator, but sweaty skin is a conductor. Of course a truthful subject may become nervous simply because of the situation, and a practiced liar may not even break a sweat. The method's practitioners claim that they can tell the difference, but you should think twice before allowing yourself to be polygraph tested. Most U.S. courts exclude all polygraph evidence, but some employers attempt to screen out dishonest employees by polygraph testing job applicants, an abuse that ranks with such pseudoscience as handwriting analysis.
A fuse is a device inserted in a circuit tollbooth-style in the same manner as an ammeter. It is simply a piece of wire made of metals having a relatively low melting point. If too much current passes through the fuse, it melts, opening the circuit. The purpose is to make sure that the building's wires do not carry so much current that they themselves will get hot enough to start a fire. Most modern houses use circuit breakers instead of fuses, although fuses are still common in cars and small devices. A circuit breaker is a switch operated by a coiled-wire magnet, which opens the circuit when enough current flows. The advantage is that once you turn off some of the appliances that were sucking up too much current, you can immediately flip the switch closed. In the days of fuses, one might get caught without a replacement fuse, or even be tempted to stuff aluminum foil in as a replacement, defeating the safety feature.
A voltmeter is nothing more than an ammeter with an additional high-value resistor through which the current is also forced to flow. Ohm's law relates the current through the resistor is related directly to the voltage difference across it, so the meter can be calibrated in units of volts based on the known value of the resistor. The voltmeter's two probes are touched to the two locations in a circuit between which we wish to measure the voltage difference, l/2. Note how cumbersome this type of drawing is, and how difficult it can be to tell what is connected to what. This is why electrical drawing are usually shown in schematic form. Figure l/3 is a schematic representation of figure l/2.
The setups for measuring current and voltage are different. When we are measuring current, we are finding “how much stuff goes through,” so we place the ammeter where all the current is forced to go through it. Voltage, however, is not “stuff that goes through,” it is a measure of electrical energy. If an ammeter is like the meter that measures your water use, a voltmeter is like a measuring stick that tells you how high a waterfall is, so that you can determine how much energy will be released by each kilogram of falling water. We do not want to force the water to go through the measuring stick! The arrangement in figure l/3 is a parallel circuit: one in there are “forks in the road” where some of the current will flow one way and some will flow the other. Figure l/4 is said to be wired in series: all the current will visit all the circuit elements one after the other. We will deal with series and parallel circuits in more detail in the following chapter.
If you inserted a voltmeter incorrectly, in series with the bulb and battery, its large internal resistance would cut the current down so low that the bulb would go out. You would have severely disturbed the behavior of the circuit by trying to measure something about it.
Incorrectly placing an ammeter in parallel is likely to be even more disconcerting. The ammeter has nothing but wire inside it to provide resistance, so given the choice, most of the current will flow through it rather than through the bulb. So much current will flow through the ammeter, in fact, that there is a danger of burning out the battery or the meter or both! For this reason, most ammeters have fuses or circuit breakers inside. Some models will trip their circuit breakers and make an audible alarm in this situation, while others will simply blow a fuse and stop working until you replace it.
◊ In figure l/1, would it make any difference in the voltage measurement if we touched the voltmeter's probes to different points along the same segments of wire?
◊ Explain why it would be incorrect to define resistance as the amount of charge the resistor allows to flow.
Ohm's law has a remarkable property, which is that current will flow even in response to a voltage difference that is as small as we care to make it. In the analogy of pushing a crate across a floor, it is as though even a flea could slide the crate across the floor, albeit at some very low speed. The flea cannot do this because of static friction, which we can think of as an effect arising from the tendency of the microscopic bumps and valleys in the crate and floor to lock together. The fact that Ohm's law holds for nearly all solids has an interesting interpretation: at least some of the electrons are not “locked down” at all to any specific atom.
More generally we can ask how charge actually flows in various solids, liquids, and gases. This will lead us to the explanations of many interesting phenomena, including lightning, the bluish crust that builds up on the terminals of car batteries, and the need for electrolytes in sports drinks.
In atomic terms, the defining characteristic of a solid is that its atoms are packed together, and the nuclei cannot move very far from their equilibrium positions. It makes sense, then, that electrons, not ions, would be the charge carriers when currents flow in solids. This fact was established experimentally by Tolman and Stewart, in an experiment in which they spun a large coil of wire and then abruptly stopped it. They observed a current in the wire immediately after the coil was stopped, which indicated that charged particles that were not permanently locked to a specific atom had continued to move because of their own inertia, even after the material of the wire in general stopped. The direction of the current showed that it was negatively charged particles that kept moving. The current only lasted for an instant, however; as the negatively charged particles collected at the downstream end of the wire, farther particles were prevented joining them due to their electrical repulsion, as well as the attraction from the upstream end, which was left with a net positive charge. Tolman and Stewart were even able to determine the mass-to-charge ratio of the particles. We need not go into the details of the analysis here, but particles with high mass would be difficult to decelerate, leading to a stronger and longer pulse of current, while particles with high charge would feel stronger electrical forces decelerating them, which would cause a weaker and shorter pulse. The mass-to-charge ratio thus determined was consistent with the m/q of the electron to within the accuracy of the experiment, which essentially established that the particles were electrons.
The fact that only electrons carry current in solids, not ions, has many important implications. For one thing, it explains why wires don't fray or turn to dust after carrying current for a long time. Electrons are very small (perhaps even pointlike), and it is easy to imagine them passing between the cracks among the atoms without creating holes or fractures in the atomic framework. For those who know a little chemistry, it also explains why all the best conductors are on the left side of the periodic table. The elements in that area are the ones that have only a very loose hold on their outermost electrons.
The molecules in a gas spend most of their time separated from each other by significant distances, so it is not possible for them to conduct electricity the way solids do, by handing off electrons from atom to atom. It is therefore not surprising that gases are good insulators.
Gases are also usually nonohmic. As opposite charges build up on a stormcloud and the ground below, the voltage difference becomes greater and greater. Zero current flows, however, until finally the voltage reaches a certain threshold and we have an impressive example of what is known as a spark or electrical discharge. If air was ohmic, the current between the cloud and the ground would simply increase steadily as the voltage difference increased, rather than being zero until a threshold was reached. This behavior can be explained as follows. At some point, the electrical forces on the air electrons and nuclei of the air molecules become so strong that electrons are ripped right off of some of the molecules. The electrons then accelerate toward either the cloud or the ground, whichever is positively charged, and the positive ions accelerate the opposite way. As these charge carriers accelerate, they strike and ionize other molecules, which produces a rapidly growing cascade.
Molecules in a liquid are able to slide past each other, so ions as well as electrons can carry currents. Pure water is a poor conductor because the water molecules tend to hold onto their electrons strongly, and there are therefore not many electrons or ions available to move. Water can become quite a good conductor, however, with the addition of even a small amount of certain substances called electrolytes, which are typically salts. For example, if we add table salt, NaCl, to water, the NaCl molecules dissolve into Na+ and Cl- ions, which can then move and create currents. This is why electric currents can flow among the cells in our bodies: cellular fluid is quite salty. When we sweat, we lose not just water but electrolytes, so dehydration plays havoc with our cells' electrical systems. It is for this reason that electrolytes are included in sports drinks and formulas for rehydrating infants who have diarrhea.
Since current flow in liquids involves entire ions, it is not surprising that we can see physical evidence when it has occurred. For example, after a car battery has been in use for a while, the H2SO4 battery acid becomes depleted of hydrogen ions, which are the main charge carriers that complete the circuit on the inside of the battery. The leftover SO4 then forms a visible blue crust on the battery posts.
When I talk on the phone to my mother in law two thousand miles away, I do not notice any delay while the signal makes its way back and forth. Electrical signals therefore must travel very quickly, but how fast exactly? The answer is rather subtle. For the sake of concreteness, let's restrict ourselves to currents in metals, which consist of electrons.
The electrons themselves are only moving at speeds of perhaps a few thousand miles per hour, and their motion is mostly random thermal motion. This shows that the electrons in my phone cannot possibly be zipping back and forth between California and New York fast enough to carry the signals. Even if their thousand-mile-an-hour motion was organized rather than random, it would still take them many minutes to get there. Realistically, it will take the average electron even longer than that to make the trip. The current in the wire consists only of a slow overall drift, at a speed on the order of a few centimeters per second, superimposed on the more rapid random motion. We can compare this with the slow westward drift in the population of the U.S. If we could make a movie of the motion of all the people in the U.S. from outer space, and could watch it at high speed so that the people appeared to be scurrying around like ants, we would think that the motion was fairly random, and we would not immediately notice the westward drift. Only after many years would we realize that the number of people heading west over the Sierras had exceeded the number going east, so that California increased its share of the country's population.
So why are electrical signals so fast if the average drift speed of electrons is so slow? The answer is that a disturbance in an electrical system can move much more quickly than the charges themselves. It is as though we filled a pipe with golf balls and then inserted an extra ball at one end, causing a ball to fall out at the other end. The force propagated to the other end in a fraction of a second, but the balls themselves only traveled a few centimeters in that time.
Because the reality of current conduction is so complex, we often describe things using mental shortcuts that are technically incorrect. This is OK as long as we know that they are just shortcuts. For example, suppose the presidents of France and Russia shake hands, and the French politician has inadvertently picked up a positive electrical charge, which shocks the Russian. We may say that the excess positively charged particles in the French leader's body, which all repel each other, take the handshake as an opportunity to get farther apart by spreading out into two bodies rather than one. In reality, it would be a matter of minutes before the ions in one person's body could actually drift deep into the other's. What really happens is that throughout the body of the recipient of the shock there are already various positive and negative ions which are free to move. Even before the perpetrator's charged hand touches the victim's sweaty palm, the charges in the shocker's body begin to repel the positive ions and attract the negative ions in the other person. The split-second sensation of shock is caused by the sudden jumping of the victim's ions by distances of perhaps a micrometer, this effect occurring simultaneously throughout the whole body, although more violently in the hand and arm, which are closer to the other person.
In section 9.1, we limited ourselves to relatively simple circuits, essentially nothing more than a battery and a single lightbulb. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce you to more complex circuits, containing multiple resistors or voltage sources in series, in parallel, or both.
I see a chess position; Kasparov sees an interesting Ruy Lopez variation. To the uninitiated a schematic may look as unintelligible as Mayan hieroglyphs, but even a little bit of eye training can go a long way toward making its meaning leap off the page. A schematic is a stylized and simplified drawing of a circuit. The purpose is to eliminate as many irrelevant features as possible, so that the relevant ones are easier to pick out.
a / 1. Wrong: The shapes of the wires are irrelevant. 2. Wrong: Right angles should be used. 3. Wrong: A simple pattern is made to look unfamiliar and complicated. 4. Right.
An example of an irrelevant feature is the physical shape, length, and diameter of a wire. In nearly all circuits, it is a good approximation to assume that the wires are perfect conductors, so that any piece of wire uninterrupted by other components has constant voltage throughout it. Changing the length of the wire, for instance, does not change this fact. (Of course if we used miles and miles of wire, as in a telephone line, the wire's resistance would start to add up, and its length would start to matter.) The shapes of the wires are likewise irrelevant, so we draw them with standardized, stylized shapes made only of vertical and horizontal lines with right-angle bends in them. This has the effect of making similar circuits look more alike and helping us to recognize familiar patterns, just as words in a newspaper are easier to recognize than handwritten ones. Figure a shows some examples of these concepts.
The most important first step in learning to read schematics is to learn to recognize contiguous pieces of wire which must have constant voltage throughout. In figure b, for example, the two shaded E-shaped pieces of wire must each have constant voltage. This focuses our attention on two of the main unknowns we'd like to be able to predict: the voltage of the left-hand E and the voltage of the one on the right.
d / Three resistors in parallel.
e / Uniting four resistors in parallel is equivalent to making a single resistor with the same length but four times the cross-sectional area. The result is to make a resistor with one quarter the resistance.
g / A voltmeter is really an ammeter with an internal resistor. When we measure the voltage difference across a resistor, 1, we are really constructing a parallel resistance circuit, 2.
One of the simplest examples to analyze is the parallel resistance circuit, of which figure b was an example. In general we may have unequal resistances R1 and R2, as in c/1. Since there are only two constant-voltage areas in the circuit, c/2, all three components have the same voltage difference across them. A battery normally succeeds in maintaining the voltage differences across itself for which it was designed, so the voltage drops Δ V1 and Δ V2 across the resistors must both equal the voltage of the battery:
Each resistance thus feels the same voltage difference as if it was the only one in the circuit, and Ohm's law tells us that the amount of current flowing through each one is also the same as it would have been in a one-resistor circuit. This is why household electrical circuits are wired in parallel. We want every appliance to work the same, regardless of whether other appliances are plugged in or unplugged, turned on or switched off. (The electric company doesn't use batteries of course, but our analysis would be the same for any device that maintains a constant voltage.)
c / 1. Two resistors in parallel. 2. There are two constant-voltage areas. 3. The current that comes out of the battery splits between the two resistors, and later reunites. 4. The two resistors in parallel can be treated as a single resistor with a smaller resistance value.
Of course the electric company can tell when we turn on every light in the house. How do they know? The answer is that we draw more current. Each resistance draws a certain amount of current, and the amount that has to be supplied is the sum of the two individual currents. The current is like a river that splits in half, c/3, and then reunites. The total current isThis is an example of a general fact called the junction rule:
In any circuit that is not storing or releasing charge, conservation of charge implies that the total current flowing out of any junction must be the same as the total flowing in.
Coming back to the analysis of our circuit, we apply Ohm's law to each resistance, resulting in
As far as the electric company is concerned, your whole house is just one resistor with some resistance R, called the equivalent resistance. They would write Ohm's law as
from which we can determine the equivalent resistance by comparison with the previous expression:
[equivalent resistance of two resistors in parallel]
Two resistors in parallel, c/4, are equivalent to a single resistor with a value given by the above equation.
◊ You turn on two lamps that are on the same household circuit. Each one has a resistance of 1 ohm. What is the equivalent resistance, and how does the power dissipation compare with the case of a single lamp?
◊ The equivalent resistance of the two lamps in parallel is
The voltage difference across the whole circuit is always the 110 V set by the electric company (it's alternating current, but that's irrelevant). The resistance of the whole circuit has been cut in half by turning on the second lamp, so a fixed amount of voltage will produce twice as much current. Twice the current flowing across the same voltage difference means twice as much power dissipation, which makes sense.
The cutting in half of the resistance surprises many students, since we are “adding more resistance” to the circuit by putting in the second lamp. Why does the equivalent resistance come out to be less than the resistance of a single lamp? This is a case where purely verbal reasoning can be misleading. A resistive circuit element, such as the filament of a lightbulb, is neither a perfect insulator nor a perfect conductor. Instead of analyzing this type of circuit in terms of “resistors,” i.e., partial insulators, we could have spoken of “conductors.” This example would then seem reasonable, since we “added more conductance,” but one would then have the incorrect expectation about the case of resistors in series, discussed in the following section.
Perhaps a more productive way of thinking about it is to use mechanical intuition. By analogy, your nostrils resist the flow of air through them, but having two nostrils makes it twice as easy to breathe.
◊ What happens if we have three or more resistors in parallel?
◊ This is an important example, because the solution involves an important technique for understanding circuits: breaking them down into smaller parts and them simplifying those parts. In the circuit d/1, with three resistors in parallel, we can think of two of the resistors as forming a single big resistor, d/2, with equivalent resistance
We can then simplify the circuit as shown in d/3, so that it contains only two resistances. The equivalent resistance of the whole circuit is then given by
Substituting for R12 and simplifying, we find the result
which you probably could have guessed. The interesting point here is the divide-and-conquer concept, not the mathematical result.
◊ What is the resistance of N identical resistors in parallel?
◊ Generalizing the results for two and three resistors, we have
where “...” means that the sum includes all the resistors. If all the resistors are identical, this becomes
We have alluded briefly to the fact that an object's electrical resistance depends on its size and shape, but now we are ready to begin making more mathematical statements about it. As suggested by figure e, increasing a resistors's cross-sectional area is equivalent to adding more resistors in parallel, which will lead to an overall decrease in resistance. Any real resistor with straight, parallel sides can be sliced up into a large number of pieces, each with cross-sectional area of, say, 1 μ m2. The number, N, of such slices is proportional to the total cross-sectional area of the resistor, and by application of the result of the previous example we therefore find that the resistance of an object is inversely proportional to its cross-sectional area.
f / A fat pipe has less resistance than a skinny pipe.
An analogous relationship holds for water pipes, which is why high-flow trunk lines have to have large cross-sectional areas. To make lots of water (current) flow through a skinny pipe, we'd need an impractically large pressure (voltage) difference.A voltmeter is really just an ammeter with an internal resistor, and we use a voltmeter in parallel with the thing that we're trying to measure the voltage difference across. This means that any time we measure the voltage drop across a resistor, we're essentially putting two resistors in parallel. The ammeter inside the voltmeter can be ignored for the purpose of analyzing what how current flows in the circuit, since it is essentially just some coiled-up wire with a very low resistance.
Now if we are carrying out this measurement on a resistor that is part of a larger circuit, we have changed the behavior of the circuit through our act of measuring. It is as though we had modified the circuit by replacing the resistance R with the smaller equivalent resistance of R and Rv in parallel. It is for this reason that voltmeters are built with the largest possible internal resistance. As a numerical example, if we use a voltmeter with an internal resistance of 1 MΩ to measure the voltage drop across a one-ohm resistor, the equivalent resistance is 0.999999 Ω, which is not different enough to make any difference. But if we tried to use the same voltmeter to measure the voltage drop across a 2-MΩ resistor, we would be reducing the resistance of that part of the circuit by a factor of three, which would produce a drastic change in the behavior of the whole circuit.
This is the reason why you can't use a voltmeter to measure the voltage difference between two different points in mid-air, or between the ends of a piece of wood. This is by no means a stupid thing to want to do, since the world around us is not a constant-voltage environment, the most extreme example being when an electrical storm is brewing. But it will not work with an ordinary voltmeter because the resistance of the air or the wood is many gigaohms. The effect of waving a pair of voltmeter probes around in the air is that we provide a reuniting path for the positive and negative charges that have been separated --- through the voltmeter itself, which is a good conductor compared to the air. This reduces to zero the voltage difference we were trying to measure.
In general, a voltmeter that has been set up with an open circuit (or a very large resistance) between its probes is said to be “floating.” An old-fashioned analog voltmeter of the type described here will read zero when left floating, the same as when it was sitting on the shelf. A floating digital voltmeter usually shows an error message.
h / 1. A battery drives current through two resistors in series. 2. There are three constant-voltage regions. 3. The three voltage differences are related. 4. If the meter crab-walks around the circuit without flipping over or crossing its legs, the resulting voltages have plus and minus signs that make them add up to zero.
i / Example 14.
j / Doubling the length of a resistor is like putting two resistors in series. The resistance is doubled.
The two basic circuit layouts are parallel and series, so a pair of resistors in series, h/1, is another of the most basic circuits we can make. By conservation of charge, all the current that flows through one resistor must also flow through the other (as well as through the battery):
The only way the information about the two resistance values is going to be useful is if we can apply Ohm's law, which will relate the resistance of each resistor to the current flowing through it and the voltage difference across it. Figure h/2 shows the three constant-voltage areas. Voltage differences are more physically significant than voltages, so we define symbols for the voltage differences across the two resistors in figure h/3.
We have three constant-voltage areas, with symbols for the difference in voltage between every possible pair of them. These three voltage differences must be related to each other. It is as though I tell you that Fred is a foot taller than Ginger, Ginger is a foot taller than Sally, and Fred is two feet taller than Sally. The information is redundant, and you really only needed two of the three pieces of data to infer the third. In the case of our voltage differences, we have
The absolute value signs are because of the ambiguity in how we define our voltage differences. If we reversed the two probes of the voltmeter, we would get a result with the opposite sign. Digital voltmeters will actually provide a minus sign on the screen if the wire connected to the “V” plug is lower in voltage than the one connected to the “COM” plug. Analog voltmeters pin the needle against a peg if you try to use them to measure negative voltages, so you have to fiddle to get the leads connected the right way, and then supply any necessary minus sign yourself.
Figure h/4 shows a standard way of taking care of the ambiguity in signs. For each of the three voltage measurements around the loop, we keep the same probe (the darker one) on the clockwise side. It is as though the voltmeter was sidling around the circuit like a crab, without ever “crossing its legs.” With this convention, the relationship among the voltage drops becomes
or, in more symmetrical form,
More generally, this is known as the loop rule for analyzing circuits:
Assuming the standard convention for plus and minus signs, the sum of the voltage drops around any closed loop in a circuit must be zero.
Looking for an exception to the loop rule would be like asking for a hike that would be downhill all the way and that would come back to its starting point!
For the circuit we set out to analyze, the equation
can now be rewritten by applying Ohm's law to each resistor:
The currents are the same, so we can factor them out:
and this is the same result we would have gotten if we had been analyzing a one-resistor circuit with resistance R1+R2. Thus the equivalent resistance of resistors in series equals the sum of their resistances.
◊ Taken as a whole, the pair of bulbs act like a doubled resistance, so they will draw half as much current from the wall. Each bulb will be dimmer than a single bulb would have been.
The total power dissipated by the circuit is IΔ V. The voltage drop across the whole circuit is the same as before, but the current is halved, so the two-bulb circuit draws half as much total power as the one-bulb circuit. Each bulb draws one-quarter of the normal power.
Roughly speaking, we might expect this to result in one quarter the light being produced by each bulb, but in reality lightbulbs waste quite a high percentage of their power in the form of heat and wavelengths of light that are not visible (infrared and ultraviolet). Less light will be produced, but it's hard to predict exactly how much less, since the efficiency of the bulbs will be changed by operating them under different conditions.
By straightforward application of the divide-and-conquer technique discussed in the previous section, we find that the equivalent resistance of N identical resistances R in series will be NR.
In the previous section, we proved that resistance is inversely proportional to cross-sectional area. By equivalent reason about resistances in series, we find that resistance is proportional to length. Analogously, it is harder to blow through a long straw than through a short one.
Putting the two arguments together, we find that the resistance of an object with straight, parallel sides is given by
The proportionality constant is called the resistivity, and it depends only on the substance of which the object is made. A resistivity measurement could be used, for instance, to help identify a sample of an unknown substance.
Now if we want to deliver a certain amount of power PL to a load such as an electric lightbulb, we are constrained only by the equation PL = IΔ VL. We can deliver any amount of power we wish, even with a low voltage, if we are willing to use large currents. Modern electrical distribution networks, however, use dangerously high voltage differences of tens of thousands of volts. Why did Edison lose the debate?
It boils down to money. The electric company must deliver the amount of power PL desired by the customer through a transmission line whose resistance RT is fixed by economics and geography. The same current flows through both the load and the transmission line, dissipating power usefully in the former and wastefully in the latter. The efficiency of the system is
Putting ourselves in the shoes of the electric company, we wish to get rid of the variable PT, since it is something we control only indirectly by our choice of Δ VT and I. Substituting PT= IΔ VT, we find
We assume the transmission line (but not necessarily the load) is ohmic, so substituting Δ VT=IRT gives
This quantity can clearly be maximized by making I as small as possible, since we will then be dividing by the smallest possible quantity on the bottom of the fraction. A low-current circuit can only deliver significant amounts of power if it uses high voltages, which is why electrical transmission systems use dangerous high voltages.
As with a voltmeter, an ammeter can give erroneous readings if it is used in such a way that it changes the behavior the circuit. An ammeter is used in series, so if it is used to measure the current through a resistor, the resistor's value will effectively be changed to R+ Ra, where Ra is the resistance of the ammeter. Ammeters are designed with very low resistances in order to make it unlikely that R+ Ra will be significantly different from R.
In fact, the real hazard is death, not a wrong reading! Virtually the only circuits whose resistances are significantly less than that of an ammeter are those designed to carry huge currents. An ammeter inserted in such a circuit can easily melt. When I was working at a laboratory funded by the Department of Energy, we got periodic bulletins from the DOE safety office about serious accidents at other sites, and they held a certain ghoulish fascination. One of these was about a DOE worker who was completely incinerated by the explosion created when he inserted an ordinary Radio Shack ammeter into a high-current circuit. Later estimates showed that the heat was probably so intense that the explosion was a ball of plasma --- a gas so hot that its atoms have been ionized.
k / Example 19.
◊ The second panel shows the circuit redrawn for simplicity, in the initial condition with the switch open. When the switch is open, no current can flow through the central resistor, so we may as well ignore it. I've also redrawn the junctions, without changing what's connected to what. This is the kind of mental rearranging that you'll eventually learn to do automatically from experience with analyzing circuits. The redrawn version makes it easier to see what's happening with the current. Charge is conserved, so any charge that flows past point 1 in the circuit must also flow past points 2 and 3. This would have been harder to reason about by applying the junction rule to the original version, which appears to have nine separate junctions.
In the new version, it's also clear that the circuit has a great deal of symmetry. We could flip over each parallel pair of identical resistors without changing what's connected to what, so that makes it clear that the voltage drops and currents must be equal for the members of each pair. We can also prove this by using the loop rule. The loop rule says that the two voltage drops in loop 4 must be equal, and similarly for loops 5 and 6. Since the resistors obey Ohm's law, equal voltage drops across them also imply equal currents. That means that when the current at point 1 comes to the top junction, exactly half of it goes through each resistor. Then the current reunites at 2, splits between the next pair, and so on. We conclude that each of the six resistors in the circuit experiences the same voltage drop and the same current. Applying the loop rule to loop 7, we find that the sum of the three voltage drops across the three left-hand resistors equals the battery's voltage, V, so each resistor in the circuit experiences a voltage drop V/3. Letting R stand for the resistance of one of the resistors, we find that the current through resistor B, which is the same as the currents through all the others, is given by Io=V/3R.
We now pass to the case where the switch is closed, as shown in the third panel. The battery's voltage is the same as before, and each resistor's resistance is the same, so we can still use the same symbols V and R for them. It is no longer true, however, that each resistor feels a voltage drop V/3. The equivalent resistance of the whole circuit is R/2+R/3+R/2=4R/3, so the total current drawn from the battery is 3V/4R. In the middle group of resistors, this current is split three ways, so the new current through B is (1/3)(3V/4R)=V/4R=3Io/4.
Interpreting this result, we see that it comes from two effects that partially cancel. Closing the switch reduces the equivalent resistance of the circuit by giving charge another way to flow, and increases the amount of current drawn from the battery. Resistor B, however, only gets a 1/3 share of this greater current, not 1/2. The second effect turns out to be bigger than the second effect, and therefore the current through resistor B is lessened over all.
◊ We have stated the loop rule in a symmetric form where a series of voltage drops adds up to zero. To do this, we had to define a standard way of connecting the voltmeter to the circuit so that the plus and minus signs would come out right. Suppose we wish to restate the junction rule in a similar symmetric way, so that instead of equating the current coming in to the current going out, it simply states that a certain sum of currents at a junction adds up to zero. What standard way of inserting the ammeter would we have to use to make this work?
\backofchapterboilerplate{dccircuits}
a / Problem 2.
b / Problem 8.
d / Problem 16.
e / Problem 18.
f / Problem 19.
g / Problem 20.
h / Problem 27.
i / Problem 28.
j / Problem 29.
k / Problem 31.
l / A printed circuit board, like the kind referred to in problem 32.
m / Problem 33.
n / Problem 34.
o / Problem 35.
1. In a wire carrying a current of 1.0 pA, how long do you have to wait, on the average, for the next electron to pass a given point? Express your answer in units of microseconds. (solution in the pdf version of the book)
2. Referring back to our old friend the neuron from problem 1 on page 467, let's now consider what happens when the nerve is stimulated to transmit information. When the blob at the top (the cell body) is stimulated, it causes Na+ ions to rush into the top of the tail (axon). This electrical pulse will then travel down the axon, like a flame burning down from the end of a fuse, with the Na+ ions at each point first going out and then coming back in. If 1010 Na+ ions cross the cell membrane in 0.5 ms, what amount of current is created? (answer check available at lightandmatter.com)
3. If a typical light bulb draws about 900 mA from a 110-V household circuit, what is its resistance? (Don't worry about the fact that it's alternating current.) (answer check available at lightandmatter.com)
4. (a) Express the power dissipated by a resistor in terms
of R and Δ V only, eliminating I.
(answer check available at lightandmatter.com)
(b)
Electrical receptacles in your home are mostly 110 V, but
circuits for electric stoves, air conditioners, and washers
and driers are usually 220 V. The two types of circuits
have differently shaped receptacles. Suppose you rewire the
plug of a drier so that it can be plugged in to a 110 V
receptacle. The resistor that forms the heating element of
the drier would normally draw 200 W. How much power does
it actually draw now?
(answer check available at lightandmatter.com)
5. Lightning discharges a cloud during an electrical storm. Suppose that the current in the lightning bolt varies with time as I=bt, where b is a constant. Find the cloud's charge as a function of time. (answer check available at lightandmatter.com)
6. A resistor has a voltage difference Δ V across it,
causing a current I to flow.
(a) Find an equation for the
power it dissipates as heat in terms of the variables I
and R only, eliminating Δ V.
(answer check available at lightandmatter.com)
(b) If an electrical
line coming to your house is to carry a given amount of
current, interpret your equation from part a to explain
whether the wire's resistance should be small, or large.
7. In AM (amplitude-modulated) radio, an audio signal f(t) is multiplied by a sine wave sin ω t in the megahertz frequency range. For simplicity, let's imagine that the transmitting antenna is a whip, and that charge goes back and forth between the top and bottom. Suppose that, during a certain time interval, the audio signal varies linearly with time, giving a charge q=(a+bt)sin ω t at the top of the whip and -q at the bottom. Find the current as a function of time. (answer check available at lightandmatter.com)
8. As discussed in the text, when a conductor reaches an equilibrium where its charge is at rest, there is always zero electric force on a charge in its interior, and any excess charge concentrates itself on the surface. The surface layer of charge arranges itself so as to produce zero total force at any point in the interior. (Otherwise the free charge in the interior could not be at rest.) Suppose you have a teardrop-shaped conductor like the one shown in the figure. Since the teardrop is a conductor, there are free charges everywhere inside it, but consider a free charged particle at the location shown with a white circle. Explain why, in order to produce zero force on this particle, the surface layer of charge must be denser in the pointed part of the teardrop. (Similar reasoning shows why lightning rods are made with points. The charged stormclouds induce positive and negative charges to move to opposite ends of the rod. At the pointed upper end of the rod, the charge tends to concentrate at the point, and this charge attracts the lightning.)
9. Use the result of problem 13 on page 469 to find an equation for the voltage at a point in space at a distance r from a point charge Q. (Take your V=0 distance to be anywhere you like.) (answer check available at lightandmatter.com)
10. Today, even a big luxury car like a Cadillac can have an
electrical system that is relatively low in power, since it
doesn't need to do much more than run headlights, power
windows, etc. In the near future, however, manufacturers
plan to start making cars with electrical systems about five
times more powerful. This will allow certain energy-wasting
parts like the water pump to be run on electrical motors
and turned off when they're not needed --- currently they're
run directly on shafts from the motor, so they can't be shut
off. It may even be possible to make an engine that can shut
off at a stoplight and then turn back on again without
cranking, since the valves can be electrically powered.
Current cars' electrical systems have 12-volt batteries
(with 14-volt chargers), but the new systems will have
36-volt batteries (with 42-volt chargers).
(a) Suppose the
battery in a new car is used to run a device that requires
the same amount of power as the corresponding device in the
old car. Based on the sample figures above, how would the
currents handled by the wires in one of the new cars compare
with the currents in the old ones?
(b) The real purpose of
the greater voltage is to handle devices that need
more power. Can you guess why they decided to change
to 36-volt batteries rather than increasing the power
without increasing the voltage?
(answer check available at lightandmatter.com)
11. We have referred to resistors dissipating heat, i.e., we have assumed that P=IΔ V is always greater than zero. Could IΔ V come out to be negative for a resistor? If so, could one make a refrigerator by hooking up a resistor in such a way that it absorbed heat instead of dissipating it?
12. What resistance values can be created by combining a 1 kΩ resistor and a 10 kΩ resistor? (solution in the pdf version of the book)
13. The figure shows a circuit containing five lightbulbs connected to a battery. Suppose you're going to connect one probe of a voltmeter to the circuit at the point marked with a dot. How many unique, nonzero voltage differences could you measure by connecting the other probe to other wires in the circuit?
14. The lightbulbs in the figure are all identical. If you were inserting an ammeter at various places in the circuit, how many unique currents could you measure? If you know that the current measurement will give the same number in more than one place, only count that as one unique current.
15. (a) You take an LP record out of its sleeve, and it
acquires a static charge of 1 nC. You play it at the normal
speed of 
r.p.m., and the charge moving in a circle
creates an electric current. What is the current, in amperes?
(answer check available at lightandmatter.com)
(b) Although the planetary model of the atom can be made to
work with any value for the radius of the electrons' orbits,
more advanced models that we will study later in this course
predict definite radii. If the electron is imagined as
circling around the proton at a speed of 2.2×106
m/s, in an orbit with a radius of 0.05 nm, what electric current is created?
(answer check available at lightandmatter.com)
16.
The figure shows a simplified diagram of a device
called a tandem accelerator, used for accelerating beams of
ions up to speeds on the order of 1% of the speed of light.
The nuclei of these ions collide with the nuclei of atoms in
a target, producing nuclear reactions for experiments
studying the structure of nuclei. The outer shell of the
accelerator is a conductor at zero voltage (i.e., the same
voltage as the Earth). The electrode at the center, known as
the “terminal,” is at a high positive voltage, perhaps
millions of volts. Negative ions with a charge of -1 unit
(i.e., atoms with one extra electron) are produced offstage
on the right, typically by chemical reactions with cesium,
which is a chemical element that has a strong tendency to
give away electrons. Relatively weak electric and magnetic
forces are used to transport these -1 ions into the
accelerator, where they are attracted to the terminal.
Although the center of the terminal has a hole in it to let
the ions pass through, there is a very thin carbon foil
there that they must physically penetrate. Passing through
the foil strips off some number of electrons, changing the
atom into a positive ion, with a charge of +n times the
fundamental charge. Now that the atom is positive, it is
repelled by the terminal, and accelerates some more on its
way out of the accelerator.
(a) Find the velocity, v, of
the emerging beam of positive ions, in terms of n, their
mass m, the terminal voltage V, and fundamental
constants. Neglect the small change in mass caused by the
loss of electrons in the stripper foil.
(b) To fuse protons
with protons, a minimum beam velocity of about 11% of the
speed of light is required. What terminal voltage would be
needed in this case?
(answer check available at lightandmatter.com)
(c) In the setup described in part b, we need a target
containing atoms whose nuclei are single protons, i.e., a target
made of hydrogen. Since hydrogen is a gas, and we want a foil
for our target, we have to use a hydrogen compound, such as
a plastic. Discuss what effect this would have on the experiment.
(answer check available at lightandmatter.com)
17. Wire is sold in a series of standard diameters, called “gauges.” The difference in diameter between one gauge and the next in the series is about 20%. How would the resistance of a given length of wire compare with the resistance of the same length of wire in the next gauge in the series? (answer check available at lightandmatter.com)
18. In the figure, the battery is 9 V.
(a) What are the
voltage differences across each light bulb?
(b) What
current flows through each of the three components of the
circuit?
(c) If a new wire is added to connect points A and
B, how will the appearances of the bulbs change? What
will be the new voltages and currents?
(d) Suppose no wire
is connected from A to B, but the two bulbs are switched.
How will the results compare with the results from the
original setup as drawn?
19. A student in a biology lab is given the following
instructions: “Connect the cerebral eraser (C.E.) and the
neural depolarizer (N.D.) in parallel with the power supply
(P.S.). (Under no circumstances should you ever allow the
cerebral eraser to come within 20 cm of your head.) Connect
a voltmeter to measure the voltage across the cerebral
eraser, and also insert an ammeter in the circuit so that
you can make sure you don't put more than 100 mA through the
neural depolarizer.” The diagrams show two lab groups'
attempts to follow the instructions.
(a) Translate diagram
1 into a standard-style schematic. What is correct and
incorrect about this group's setup?
(b) Do the same for diagram 2.
20. Referring back to problem 15 on page 469 about the sodium chloride crystal, suppose the lithium ion is going to jump from the gap it is occupying to one of the four closest neighboring gaps. Which one will it jump to, and if it starts from rest, how fast will it be going by the time it gets there? (It will keep on moving and accelerating after that, but that does not concern us.) [Hint: The approach is similar to the one used for the other problem, but you want to work with voltage and electrical energy rather than force.] (answer check available at lightandmatter.com)
21. A 1.0 Ω toaster and a 2.0 Ω lamp are connected in
parallel with the 110-V supply of your house. (Ignore the
fact that the voltage is AC rather than DC.)
(a) Draw a
schematic of the circuit.
(b) For each of the three
components in the circuit, find the current passing through
it and the voltage drop across it.
(c) Suppose they were
instead hooked up in series. Draw a schematic and
calculate the same things.
22. The heating element of an electric stove is connected in series with a switch that opens and closes many times per second. When you turn the knob up for more power, the fraction of the time that the switch is closed increases. Suppose someone suggests a simpler alternative for controlling the power by putting the heating element in series with a variable resistor controlled by the knob. (With the knob turned all the way clockwise, the variable resistor's resistance is nearly zero, and when it's all the way counterclockwise, its resistance is essentially infinite.) (a) Draw schematics. (b) Why would the simpler design be undesirable?
23. You have a circuit consisting of two unknown resistors in
series, and a second circuit consisting of two unknown
resistors in parallel.
(a) What, if anything, would you
learn about the resistors in the series circuit by finding
that the currents through them were equal?
(b) What if you
found out the voltage differences across the resistors in
the series circuit were equal?
(c) What would you learn
about the resistors in the parallel circuit from knowing
that the currents were equal?
(d) What if the voltages in
the parallel circuit were equal?
24. How many different resistance values can be created by combining three unequal resistors? (Don't count possibilities in which not all the resistors are used, i.e., ones in which there is zero current in one or more of them.)
25. Suppose six identical resistors, each with resistance R, are connected so that they form the edges of a tetrahedron (a pyramid with three sides in addition to the base, i.e., one less side than an Egyptian pyramid). What resistance value or values can be obtained by making connections onto any two points on this arrangement? (solution in the pdf version of the book)
26. A person in a rural area who has no electricity runs an extremely long extension cord to a friend's house down the road so she can run an electric light. The cord is so long that its resistance, x, is not negligible. Show that the lamp's brightness is greatest if its resistance, y, is equal to x. Explain physically why the lamp is dim for values of y that are too small or too large.
27. All three resistors have the same resistance, R. Find the three unknown currents in terms of V1, V2, and R. (answer check available at lightandmatter.com)
28. You are given a battery, a flashlight bulb, and a single piece of wire. Draw at least two configurations of these items that would result in lighting up the bulb, and at least two that would not light it. (Don't draw schematics.) If you're not sure what's going on, borrow the materials from your instructor and try it. Note that the bulb has two electrical contacts: one is the threaded metal jacket, and the other is the tip (at the bottom in the figure). [Problem by Arnold Arons.]
29. The figure shows a simplified diagram of an electron
gun such as the
one that creates the electron beam in a TV tube. Electrons
that spontaneously emerge from the negative electrode
(cathode) are then accelerated to the positive electrode,
which has a hole in it. (Once they emerge through the hole,
they will slow down. However, if the two electrodes are
fairly close together, this slowing down is a small effect,
because the attractive and repulsive forces experienced by
the electron tend to cancel.)
(a) If the voltage difference
between the electrodes is Δ V, what is the velocity
of an electron as it emerges at B? Assume that its initial
velocity, at A, is negligible, and that the velocity is nonrelativistic.
(If you haven't read ch. 7 yet, don't worry about the remark about
relativity.)
(answer check available at lightandmatter.com)
(b) Evaluate your
expression numerically for the case where Δ V=10 kV,
and compare to the speed of light. If you've read ch. 7 already,
comment on whether the assumption
of nonrelativistic motion was justified.
(solution in the pdf version of the book)(answer check available at lightandmatter.com)
30. (a) Many battery-operated devices take more than one
battery. If you look closely in the battery compartment, you
will see that the batteries are wired in series. Consider a
flashlight circuit. What does the loop rule tell you about
the effect of putting several batteries in series in this
way?
(b) The cells of an electric eel's nervous system are
not that different from ours --- each cell can develop a
voltage difference across it of somewhere on the order of
one volt. How, then, do you think an electric eel can create
voltages of thousands of volts between different parts of its body?
31. The figure shows two possible ways of wiring a flashlight with a switch. Both will serve to turn the bulb on and off, although the switch functions in the opposite sense. Why is method (1) preferable?
32. You have to do different things with a circuit to measure current than to measure a voltage difference. Which would be more practical for a printed circuit board, in which the wires are actually strips of metal embedded inside the board? (solution in the pdf version of the book)
35. The bulbs all have unequal resistances. Given the three currents shown in the figure, find the currents through bulbs A, B, C, and D.
1. How many different currents could you measure in this circuit? Make a prediction, and then try it.
What do you notice? How does this make sense in terms of the roller coaster metaphor introduced in discussion question 9.1.3A on page 481?
What is being used up in the resistor?
2. By connecting probes to these points, how many ways could you measure a voltage? How many of them would be different numbers? Make a prediction, and then do it.
What do you notice? Interpret this using the roller coaster metaphor, and color in parts of the circuit that represent constant voltages.
3. The resistors are unequal. How many different voltages and currents can you measure? Make a prediction, and then try it.
What do you notice? Interpret this using the roller coaster metaphor, and color in parts of the circuit that represent constant voltages.
Apparatus:
DC power supply
multimeter
resistors
1. The junction rule
Construct a circuit like this one, using the power supply as your voltage source. To make things more interesting, don't use equal resistors. Use nice big resistors (say 100 kΩ to 1 MΩ) --- this will ensure that you don't burn up the resistors, and that the multimeter's small internal resistance when used as an ammeter is negligible in comparison.
Insert your multimeter in the circuit to measure all three currents that you need in order to test the junction rule.
2. The loop rule
Now come up with a circuit to test the loop rule. Since the loop rule is always supposed to be true, it's hard to go wrong here! Make sure you have at least three resistors in a loop, and make sure you hook in the power supply in a way that creates non-zero voltage differences across all the resistors. Measure the voltage differences you need to measure to test the loop rule. Here it is best to use fairly small resistances, so that the multimeter's large internal resistance when used in parallel as a voltmeter will not significantly reduce the resistance of the circuit. Do not use resistances of less than about 100 Ω, however, or you may blow a fuse or burn up a resistor.
The questions in this exercise can all be solved using some combination of the following approaches:
a) There is constant voltage throughout any conductor.
b) Ohm's law can be applied to any part of a circuit.
c) Apply the loop rule.
d) Apply the junction rule.
In each case, discuss the question, decide what you think is the right answer, and then try the experiment.
1. A wire is added in parallel with one bulb.
Which reasoning is correct?
2. The series circuit is changed as shown.
Which reasoning is correct?
3. A wire is added as shown to the original circuit.
What is wrong with the following reasoning?
The top right bulb will go out, because its two sides are now connected with wire, so there will be no voltage difference across it. The other three bulbs will not be affected.
4. A wire is added as shown to the original circuit.
What is wrong with the following reasoning?
The current flows out of the right side of the battery. When it hits the first junction, some of it will go left and some will keep going up The part that goes up lights the top right bulb. The part that turns left then follows the path of least resistance, going through the new wire instead of the bottom bulb. The top bulb stays lit, the bottom one goes out, and others stay the same.
5. What happens when one bulb is unscrewed, leaving an air gap?
